Overstock, Patrick Byrne Hit With Class Action Over 'Market Manipulation'

An investor has launched a class action lawsuit against Overstock and two former execs, claiming securities violations through making false statements to manipulate the firm's stock price.

Ha states that the defendants' alleged false claims allowed them to artificially inflate the value of Overstock stock and allowed former CEO Patrick Byrne to sell all of his shares - worth over $100 million at the time - at unrealistic prices.

Further, according to the document, the claims allowed Overstock to sell off more stock to the market to fund its cryptocurrency projects, and caused Ha and other investors to buy stock at "Artificially inflated prices."

Byrne - who left the firm in August after disclosing that he'd had a three-year affair with a Russian agent - is accused of selling his shares while in possession of adverse information not disclosed to shareholders.

The complaint also addresses previously public claims that Overstock had used its unusual crypto shareholders' dividend, in the form of a digital security issued via its subsidiary tZERO, to take "Revenge" on short sellers.

"While defendant Byrne had previously, at different times, launched into public tirades over short selling and naked short selling, the tZERO Dividend was his secret plot to finally obtain hegemony over them - and it almost worked."

The complaint alleges, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was working behind the scenes, telling Overstock that it would not allow the locked-up dividend.

Some banks were also easing the situation for short sellers by saying they would accept a cash equivalent to the locked-up digital shares.

As a result, on Sept. 18, Overstock moved to restructure the dividend to end the lockup and allow the shares to be freely traded at issuance.

Briefly, the firm's initial announcements on the lockup had caused its stock price to bounce, at which time Byrne is said to have capitalized by selling his shares - even, it is alleged, while the SEC was telling the firm it would not allow the dividend in its current form.